Du bist hier: Home » StripChat Mobile Version » Condomless genital (CVI) or anal (CAI) sex with feminine lovers.

Condomless genital (CVI) or anal (CAI) sex with feminine lovers.

Condomless genital (CVI) or anal (CAI) sex with feminine lovers.

Examined using standard laboratory procedures. Later on dichotomized to denote transmissibility that is potentially efficient a conservative measure (viral load ≥1500 copies/mL) (Quinn et al., 2000).

Condomless vaginal (CVI) or anal (CAI) sex with feminine partners.Participants had been expected if they involved with CVI or CAI by having a female that is main and, if so, what that partner’s HIV status had been (negative/positive/unknown). By cross referencing a participant’s HIV serostatus together with his partner’s observed serostatus for both CVI and CAI and summing after which dichotomizing these outcomes, we created a dichotomous adjustable showing any condomless sexual activity with main feminine lovers of serodiscordant/unknown HIV status. This variable was assessed only for main female partners, in study visits 46–50 (2007–2009) only in the MACS instrument.

Possibly transmission that is efficient

We further classified condomless sexual intercourse with ladies as dichotomous factors showing possibly efficient transmission activities if HIV good participants had viral loads ≥1500 at visits whenever condomless sex with ladies ended up being reported. For variables evaluated longitudinally (intimate partnership and danger), we carried out a few general linear mixed models utilizing PROC GLIMMIX in SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), utilising the LSMEANS declaration for group comparisons and a duplicated measures declaration with accordingly specified distributions (binary with logit link for dichotomous factors; Poisson with log link for proportions) and model derived variance components. General minimum squares means quotes were produced from noticed means. Within MSMW trajectory results had been predicted by determining the importance of change as time passes. Longitudinal models managed for time (research see), age, race/ethnicity, earnings, and HIV status, led by the literary works on MSMW (M. R. Friedman, Stall, et al., 2014). We examined cross sectional variables (distinctions in retrospectively reported chronilogical age of attraction and chronilogical age of intimate first with women and men, correspondingly) via paired t tests.


An overall total of 1625 males reported activity that is sexual 2002 2009 with a stripchat minumum of one guy. Of those, 111 men reported activity that is sexual at minimum one male and also at least one feminine partner with this period. These males had been a part of longitudinal analyses. Dining dining Table 1 shows faculties of MSMW in this test. Of those MSMW, 93 (83.8%) finished one or more retrospective psychosexual question that is developmental visits 49/50 as a key part associated with Methamphetamine Sub research; these guys had been contained in cross sectional analyses.

Hypothesis 1: Within MSMW, the percentage of intimate lovers that are feminine decreases significantly with time. Proportions of MSMW when you look at the MACS reporting any intercourse with males, any intercourse with females, and reported proportion of most intimate lovers whom are feminine at each and every research revolution information points and regression lines from minimum squares means quotes. Versions controlled for research check out, race/ethnicity, earnings, age under 40, and HIV status. Hypothesis 2: Within MSMW, activity that is sexual feminine lovers declines somewhat in the long run in accordance with sexual intercourse with male partners. Outcome: We didn’t find proof supporting this theory. dining dining Table 2 indicates that, within MSMW, significant time results happened for reporting any intercourse with males (p Figure 1 illustrates the overall decrease with time in reported sexual intercourse with both and feminine lovers. Dining dining Table 3 reveals that Black MSMW had been much more likely than White MSMW to report any intercourse with females (43.8% vs. 28.4%; P Table 4 suggests that MSMW reported later ages of attraction to females rather than men (12.6 vs. 10.4; t=2.8, P dining Table 3 reveals that, in accordance with HIV negative MSMW, HIV good MSMW reported lower feminine partner proportions (16.9% vs. 34.1%; p dining dining Table 3 demonstrates that general, simply 8.5percent of HIV good MSMW reported intercourse that is condomless feminine lovers at an offered observation. Furthermore, just 3.5percent of HIV good MSMW reported possibly efficient transmission intimate occasions with main feminine lovers at a offered observation. These quotes didn’t differ somewhat by age, income, or race/ethnicity.

Download PDF  Artikel drucken (PDF)

Über den Autor

Benjamin Kratsch
Anzahl der Artikel : 8404

© back view e.V., 2007 - 2017

Scrolle zum Anfang